Skip to content

Spec Process Checklists

This document provides comprehensive checklists for each phase of the spec-driven development process. Use these checklists to ensure quality and completeness at each stage.

Requirements Phase Checklist

Initial Requirements Gathering

Content Quality

  • [ ] Clear Introduction: Feature overview explains the problem and solution
  • [ ] Business Value: Clear articulation of why this feature is needed
  • [ ] Scope Definition: What's included and excluded is explicitly stated
  • [ ] Stakeholder Identification: All relevant stakeholders are identified

User Stories

  • [ ] Complete Format: All user stories follow "As a [role], I want [feature], so that [benefit]" format
  • [ ] Clear Roles: User roles are specific and well-defined
  • [ ] Valuable Features: Each feature provides clear user value
  • [ ] Measurable Benefits: Benefits are specific and measurable where possible

EARS Format Compliance

  • [ ] WHEN Statements: Event-driven requirements use WHEN correctly
  • [ ] IF Statements: Conditional requirements use IF appropriately
  • [ ] WHILE Statements: Continuous behaviors use WHILE correctly
  • [ ] WHERE Statements: Context-specific requirements use WHERE appropriately
  • [ ] SHALL Usage: All system responses use SHALL for mandatory behavior

Acceptance Criteria Quality

  • [ ] Testable: Each criterion can be objectively tested
  • [ ] Specific: Criteria avoid vague terms like "user-friendly" or "fast"
  • [ ] Complete: All aspects of the requirement are covered
  • [ ] Unambiguous: Criteria have only one possible interpretation
  • [ ] Measurable: Quantitative criteria include specific metrics

Non-Functional Requirements

  • [ ] Performance: Response time and throughput requirements specified
  • [ ] Security: Authentication, authorization, and data protection covered
  • [ ] Usability: User experience and accessibility requirements included
  • [ ] Reliability: Error handling and recovery requirements defined
  • [ ] Scalability: Growth and load requirements addressed

Requirements Organization

  • [ ] Logical Grouping: Related requirements are grouped together
  • [ ] Clear Numbering: Hierarchical numbering system is consistent
  • [ ] Priority Assignment: Requirements have clear priority levels
  • [ ] Dependency Mapping: Dependencies between requirements are identified

Requirements Review and Validation

Completeness Check

  • [ ] All Scenarios Covered: Positive, negative, and edge cases included
  • [ ] Integration Points: External system interactions are specified
  • [ ] Data Requirements: Data models and validation rules are defined
  • [ ] Error Conditions: Error scenarios and handling are documented

Quality Assurance

  • [ ] No Conflicts: Requirements don't contradict each other
  • [ ] Feasibility: Technical feasibility has been considered
  • [ ] Consistency: Terminology is used consistently throughout
  • [ ] Traceability: Requirements can be traced to business objectives

Stakeholder Validation

  • [ ] Business Approval: Business stakeholders have reviewed and approved
  • [ ] Technical Review: Technical team has validated feasibility
  • [ ] User Validation: End users have provided input where appropriate
  • [ ] Compliance Check: Regulatory and policy requirements are met

Design Phase Checklist

Architecture and Design

High-Level Architecture

  • [ ] System Context: How the feature fits into the broader system is clear
  • [ ] Component Identification: Major components and their responsibilities are defined
  • [ ] Interface Definition: Interfaces between components are specified
  • [ ] Technology Choices: Technology stack decisions are justified

Detailed Design

  • [ ] Data Models: Complete data structures with validation rules
  • [ ] API Specifications: Detailed API endpoints with request/response formats
  • [ ] Business Logic: Core algorithms and business rules are documented
  • [ ] Integration Points: External system integrations are detailed

Design Quality

  • [ ] Modularity: Components are loosely coupled and highly cohesive
  • [ ] Extensibility: Design supports future enhancements
  • [ ] Maintainability: Code organization supports easy maintenance
  • [ ] Reusability: Common patterns and components are identified

Non-Functional Design

Performance Design

  • [ ] Scalability: Design supports expected load and growth
  • [ ] Caching Strategy: Appropriate caching mechanisms are planned
  • [ ] Database Optimization: Query optimization and indexing considered
  • [ ] Resource Usage: Memory and CPU usage patterns are analyzed

Security Design

  • [ ] Authentication: User authentication mechanisms are specified
  • [ ] Authorization: Access control and permissions are designed
  • [ ] Data Protection: Encryption and data handling procedures are defined
  • [ ] Input Validation: Security validation and sanitization are planned

Reliability Design

  • [ ] Error Handling: Comprehensive error handling strategy is defined
  • [ ] Monitoring: Observability and monitoring approaches are planned
  • [ ] Recovery: Backup and disaster recovery procedures are considered
  • [ ] Testing Strategy: Comprehensive testing approach is outlined

Design Documentation

Visual Documentation

  • [ ] Architecture Diagrams: Clear visual representation of system architecture
  • [ ] Data Flow Diagrams: How data moves through the system
  • [ ] Sequence Diagrams: Interaction patterns between components
  • [ ] State Diagrams: System state transitions where applicable

Technical Specifications

  • [ ] API Documentation: Complete API specifications with examples
  • [ ] Database Schema: Detailed database design with relationships
  • [ ] Configuration: Environment and deployment configuration requirements
  • [ ] Dependencies: External libraries and services are documented

Design Review and Validation

Requirements Alignment

  • [ ] Complete Coverage: All requirements are addressed in the design
  • [ ] Traceability: Design elements can be traced back to requirements
  • [ ] Gap Analysis: No requirements are left unaddressed
  • [ ] Scope Validation: Design stays within defined scope

Technical Review

  • [ ] Architecture Review: Senior developers have reviewed the architecture
  • [ ] Security Review: Security team has validated security aspects
  • [ ] Performance Review: Performance implications have been analyzed
  • [ ] Integration Review: Integration points have been validated

Tasks Phase Checklist

Task Planning and Organization

Task Structure

  • [ ] Clear Objectives: Each task has a specific, measurable objective
  • [ ] Appropriate Scope: Tasks are sized for 1-2 days of work
  • [ ] Logical Sequence: Tasks are ordered to build incrementally
  • [ ] Dependency Management: Task dependencies are clearly identified

Task Details

  • [ ] Acceptance Criteria: Each task has specific completion criteria
  • [ ] Implementation Notes: Key implementation details are provided
  • [ ] Testing Requirements: Testing expectations are clearly stated
  • [ ] Requirements Traceability: Tasks link back to specific requirements

Task Categories

  • [ ] Foundation Tasks: Setup and infrastructure tasks are included
  • [ ] Core Logic Tasks: Business logic implementation is covered
  • [ ] Integration Tasks: System integration work is planned
  • [ ] Testing Tasks: Comprehensive testing tasks are included
  • [ ] Documentation Tasks: Documentation updates are planned

Implementation Planning

Development Strategy

  • [ ] Test-Driven Approach: TDD/BDD strategy is defined where appropriate
  • [ ] Code Quality Standards: Quality expectations are established
  • [ ] Review Process: Code review procedures are planned
  • [ ] Integration Strategy: How components will be integrated is clear

Risk Management

  • [ ] Technical Risks: Potential technical challenges are identified
  • [ ] Dependency Risks: External dependency risks are considered
  • [ ] Resource Risks: Team capacity and skill requirements are assessed
  • [ ] Timeline Risks: Schedule risks and mitigation strategies are planned

Quality Assurance

  • [ ] Testing Strategy: Unit, integration, and E2E testing is planned
  • [ ] Performance Testing: Performance validation approach is defined
  • [ ] Security Testing: Security validation procedures are included
  • [ ] User Acceptance: User validation and feedback processes are planned

Task Validation and Review

Completeness Check

  • [ ] Full Coverage: All design elements are covered by tasks
  • [ ] No Gaps: No implementation areas are left unaddressed
  • [ ] Realistic Scope: Task scope is achievable within constraints
  • [ ] Resource Alignment: Tasks match available team skills and capacity

Quality Validation

  • [ ] Actionable Tasks: Each task can be executed by a developer
  • [ ] Clear Deliverables: Expected outputs are clearly defined
  • [ ] Measurable Progress: Task completion can be objectively measured
  • [ ] Integration Ready: Tasks build toward a cohesive implementation

Stakeholder Review

  • [ ] Technical Approval: Development team has reviewed and approved tasks
  • [ ] Business Alignment: Tasks align with business priorities and timeline
  • [ ] Resource Confirmation: Required resources and skills are available
  • [ ] Timeline Validation: Task timeline is realistic and achievable

Cross-Phase Quality Checks

Documentation Quality

Consistency

  • [ ] Terminology: Consistent terminology across all documents
  • [ ] Formatting: Consistent formatting and structure
  • [ ] Cross-References: Proper linking between related sections
  • [ ] Version Control: Document versions are properly managed

Completeness

  • [ ] All Phases: Requirements, design, and tasks are all complete
  • [ ] Traceability: Clear traceability from requirements through tasks
  • [ ] No Orphans: No requirements without design, no design without tasks
  • [ ] Validation: All documents have been reviewed and approved

Usability

  • [ ] Clear Navigation: Easy to find and navigate between sections
  • [ ] Searchable: Documents are organized for easy searching
  • [ ] Actionable: Information is presented in an actionable format
  • [ ] Maintainable: Documents can be easily updated and maintained

Process Validation

Workflow Compliance

  • [ ] Phase Completion: Each phase was completed before moving to the next
  • [ ] Review Gates: Proper reviews were conducted at each phase
  • [ ] Stakeholder Involvement: Appropriate stakeholders were engaged
  • [ ] Change Management: Changes were properly documented and approved

Quality Gates

  • [ ] Requirements Quality: Requirements meet quality standards
  • [ ] Design Quality: Design addresses all requirements appropriately
  • [ ] Task Quality: Tasks provide clear implementation roadmap
  • [ ] Overall Coherence: All documents work together cohesively

Implementation Execution Checklist

Pre-Implementation Setup

Environment Preparation

  • [ ] Development Environment: Development environment is set up and tested
  • [ ] Dependencies: All required dependencies are installed and configured
  • [ ] Tools: Development tools and IDE are configured properly
  • [ ] Access: Required system access and permissions are in place

Team Preparation

  • [ ] Role Assignment: Team roles and responsibilities are clear
  • [ ] Knowledge Transfer: Relevant knowledge has been shared with the team
  • [ ] Communication: Communication channels and processes are established
  • [ ] Timeline: Implementation timeline and milestones are agreed upon

During Implementation

Task Execution

  • [ ] One Task at a Time: Focus on completing one task before starting another
  • [ ] Acceptance Criteria: Each task meets its defined acceptance criteria
  • [ ] Code Quality: Code follows established standards and best practices
  • [ ] Testing: Appropriate tests are written and passing

Progress Tracking

  • [ ] Status Updates: Regular progress updates are provided
  • [ ] Blocker Management: Blockers are identified and addressed promptly
  • [ ] Quality Monitoring: Code quality metrics are monitored
  • [ ] Requirement Validation: Implementation is validated against requirements

Post-Implementation Validation

Completion Verification

  • [ ] All Tasks Complete: All planned tasks have been completed
  • [ ] Requirements Met: All requirements have been implemented and tested
  • [ ] Quality Standards: Code meets all quality and performance standards
  • [ ] Documentation Updated: All documentation has been updated appropriately

Final Review

  • [ ] Code Review: Complete code review has been conducted
  • [ ] Testing Validation: All tests are passing and coverage is adequate
  • [ ] Performance Validation: Performance requirements are met
  • [ ] Security Validation: Security requirements are satisfied
  • [ ] User Acceptance: User acceptance testing has been completed successfully

Troubleshooting Checklist

Common Issues and Solutions

Requirements Phase Issues

  • [ ] Vague Requirements: Break down into more specific, testable criteria
  • [ ] Missing Stakeholders: Identify and engage all relevant stakeholders
  • [ ] Scope Creep: Clearly define and communicate scope boundaries
  • [ ] Conflicting Requirements: Resolve conflicts through stakeholder discussion

Design Phase Issues

  • [ ] Over-Engineering: Simplify design to meet current requirements
  • [ ] Under-Specification: Add necessary detail for implementation clarity
  • [ ] Technology Mismatch: Validate technology choices against requirements
  • [ ] Integration Complexity: Simplify integration points where possible

Tasks Phase Issues

  • [ ] Tasks Too Large: Break down large tasks into smaller, manageable pieces
  • [ ] Missing Dependencies: Identify and document all task dependencies
  • [ ] Unclear Objectives: Clarify task objectives and acceptance criteria
  • [ ] Resource Mismatch: Align tasks with available team skills and capacity

Implementation Issues

  • [ ] Requirement Misunderstanding: Refer back to original requirements and design
  • [ ] Technical Blockers: Escalate technical issues and seek expert help
  • [ ] Quality Issues: Implement additional testing and code review processes
  • [ ] Timeline Pressure: Prioritize critical functionality and defer nice-to-haves

Quality Metrics and KPIs

Requirements Quality Metrics

  • Completeness: Percentage of requirements with complete acceptance criteria
  • Testability: Percentage of requirements that are objectively testable
  • Traceability: Percentage of requirements traced to business objectives
  • Stakeholder Approval: Percentage of requirements approved by stakeholders

Design Quality Metrics

  • Coverage: Percentage of requirements addressed in design
  • Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity of proposed architecture
  • Reusability: Number of reusable components identified
  • Performance: Estimated performance against requirements

Implementation Quality Metrics

  • Task Completion: Percentage of tasks completed on schedule
  • Code Quality: Code quality metrics (coverage, complexity, etc.)
  • Defect Rate: Number of defects found during implementation
  • Requirement Satisfaction: Percentage of requirements fully implemented

Process Quality Metrics

  • Cycle Time: Time from requirements to implementation completion
  • Rework Rate: Percentage of work that required significant rework
  • Stakeholder Satisfaction: Stakeholder satisfaction with the process
  • Team Velocity: Rate of task completion over time

Downloadable Checklists

Quick Reference Checklists

Requirements Phase Quick Checklist

# Requirements Quick Checklist

## Document Structure
- [ ] Clear introduction and problem statement
- [ ] User stories with roles, features, and benefits
- [ ] EARS-formatted acceptance criteria
- [ ] Non-functional requirements
- [ ] Constraints and assumptions

## Quality Check
- [ ] All requirements are testable
- [ ] No vague or ambiguous language
- [ ] Requirements are prioritized
- [ ] Dependencies are identified
- [ ] All stakeholders have reviewed

Design Phase Quick Checklist

# Design Quick Checklist

## Document Structure
- [ ] Architecture overview with diagrams
- [ ] Component responsibilities defined
- [ ] Interface specifications
- [ ] Data models and validation rules
- [ ] Error handling strategy

## Quality Check
- [ ] All requirements are addressed
- [ ] Design is modular and maintainable
- [ ] Security considerations included
- [ ] Performance considerations included
- [ ] Technical team has reviewed

Tasks Phase Quick Checklist

# Tasks Quick Checklist

## Document Structure
- [ ] Incremental implementation plan
- [ ] Tasks with clear objectives
- [ ] Requirements traceability
- [ ] Testing strategy for each component
- [ ] Dependency management

## Quality Check
- [ ] Tasks are appropriately sized
- [ ] All design elements are covered
- [ ] Tasks build incrementally
- [ ] Implementation risks identified
- [ ] Development team has reviewed

Success Metrics and Measurement

Track the effectiveness of your spec-driven development process:

Spec Quality Metrics

  • Requirements Clarity Score: % of requirements that need no clarification during implementation
  • Design Completeness: % of implementation covered by design documentation
  • Task Accuracy: % of tasks completed within estimated time
  • Change Rate: Number of spec changes per week during implementation

Development Impact Metrics

  • Time to Implementation: Days from spec approval to feature completion
  • Defect Rate: Bugs found per feature compared to baseline
  • Rework Percentage: % of code that needs significant revision
  • Stakeholder Satisfaction: Survey scores from business stakeholders

Process Efficiency Metrics

  • Spec Creation Time: Hours spent on each phase of spec development
  • Review Cycle Time: Days from spec submission to approval
  • Implementation Velocity: Story points or features completed per sprint
  • Knowledge Transfer Success: % of team members who can work on spec'd features

Measurement Guidelines

  1. Baseline First: Measure current performance before implementing specs
  2. Track Consistently: Use same metrics across all projects
  3. Review Regularly: Assess metrics monthly and adjust process
  4. Focus on Trends: Look for improvement over time, not absolute numbers

← Tasks Template | Tool Integration Guide →